SKU: 52631567079

"Playboy: Girls/ Women Of The Ivy League Revealed" September 1979

Sale price$97.65 Regular price$108.50
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $27.12 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 16 - Sep 21

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

"Playboy: Girls/ Women Of The Ivy League Revealed" September 1979[286] pp. 1979 11" x 8 1 2" VG At the Dartmouth College library, Playboy magazine was in such demand this week that the librarians lent it out for only two hours at a time and checked carefully each time it was returned, to see whether any pages were missing. Students lined up at Harvard Square to buy the September issue of the magazine, and it sold out at Princeton. At Brown, fraternity members reserved copies ahead of time. At Yale, one newsstand

[286] pp.

1979

11" x 8 1/2"

VG

At the Dartmouth College library, Playboy magazine was in such demand this week that the librarians lent it out for only two hours at a time and checked carefully each time it was returned, to see whether any pages were missing.

Students lined up at Harvard Square to buy the September issue of the magazine, and it sold out at Princeton. At Brown, fraternity members reserved copies ahead of time. At Yale, one newsstand reported first‐day sales were seven times the average — and Yale is closed for summer recess.

Some professors joined the rush while others frowned on it, but no one maintained that he was reading the articles. Most turned quickly to page 159, the beginning of an 11‐page, full‐color feature on Ivy League women.

It contains 30 pictures of women from that high‐pressure academic world, where the emphasis is on preparation for, and promise of, a bright career.

With Phi Beta Kappa Key

The centerfold, a three‐page fold‐out distinct from the Ivy feature, features a University of California law student wearing only a sweater and cap. She has worked as a volunteer for the National Women's Political Caucus and wore her Phi Beta Kappa key to her first session with a Playboy photographer.

Being part of Playboy's monthly ration of flesh‐filled pictures did pose problems for some of the students who were photographed. One problem was the protests of campus feminists, who shad contended that the magazine degraded women, and whose anger was rekindled when the feature came out this week.

As they did last winter, when a Playboy photographer toured Ivy League campuses and advertised in student newspapers for women to pose for the feature, college feminists raised the issue of free speech versus perceived pornography. But they have not scheduled any feminist demonstrations since the magazine came out.

Various Explanations

“I don't think Playboy should exist at all,” said Naomi Cahn of Princeton's Women's Center. “I don't think It, should have been able to advertise to interview women for their pictorial, because their profits are built on a basis of exploitation of women.”

Most of the Ivy League women who posed maintained that the pictures would be forgotten by the time school opened next month. Their explanations for posing ranged from the idea that presented a challenge, to the concept that it was art. They were paid fees ranging from $100 fully clothed to $400 for unclothed poses.

Editors’ Picks

James Ellroy’s New Novel Is a Clash Between Cops and Communists

How a Family of 4 (and One Kid in College) Live on $85,000 a Year in the Bronx

Sqirl’s Dream of Los Angeles, Now at Dinnertime
“It was not a moral issue and it was just a challenge I couldn't resist,” said a Brown student, who posed using the pseudonym, Angela Ray.

“To me, posing for Playboy was no big deal,” said Carrie Margolin, a doctoral candidate in educational psychology at Dartmouth. “There must be a lot of people who feel that Ivy League women are sacred or something.”

“This was for Brown, and that's why I did it,” said Hillary Clayson, a 19year‐old sophomore, who called the feminists at Brown “extremely annoying.”

But, Miss Clayson continued, “I'm afraid of being asked about the maga‐. zine and what it does to women. I wonder if I haven't made a mistake.” She also said that she was glad the issue came out in August “because all the attention makes me nervous.”

The attention has created other problems for some of the women. Lisa Bennett Fedors, a Princeton graduate student, said she had received a few obscene telephone calls since the magazine went on sale. Others are worried that they might be recognized on the street.

Effect on Careers

And some are concerned that their career prospects might be endangered. But Vicki McCarty, the Berkeley graduate pictured in the centerfold, said that she had changed her mind—Playboy would probably be “a career advantage, instead of a disadvantage.”

Of the Ivy League women, one said she wants to be a biomedical engineer. Another owns a solar‐energy consulting concern with her husband. Another, whose $400 payment for being photographed went toward a trip to Leningrad, said she wanted to be a foreign correspondent for a newspaper.

Playboy made some converts among Ivy League women who had never expected to see themselves near a centerfold. Debbie K. Solomon, a Cornell art history major, turned down summer job offers from the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Hirshhorn Museum in Washington to work in Playboy's promotion department in Chicago. In the magazine she was pictured fully clothed.

“Too many people see an Ivy League education as career vocational training,” she said, “and your education should never be directed that way.”

Four others posed for Playboy but insisted on using pseudonyms, including Miss Ray, the only woman at Brown who lived in a fraternity. She said she insisted on the false name because she had not told her parents that she was posing and was afraid of what they would say.

Playboy spokesmen say the magazine ventured into the Ivy League expecting to find very bright women who were not very pretty. “You tend to think of Emily Dickinson types,” said David Salyers of Playboy. “Horsey women in tweeds.”

In the process, Playboy says, its own consciousness was raised. In previous features on college students the magazine referred to them as “girls.” After the anti‐Playboy demonstrations last winter, Playboy decided to refer to the Ivy Leaguers as “women.”

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 52631567079

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 22 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
Y
Verified Purchase
yodan2
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Great value
Set name: Sublimation Printer
This is my first sublimation printer and I am very happy with this printer. The photos that I have printed have been very good quality and vibrant colors and have applied really well to the sublimation blanks I have used. I like that it will self clean the heads as long as the printer power is on. It was important to me to get an actual sublimation printer in order to have the warranty on it. The printer works with the Artspira app. This app is only available on a smart phone or tablet. It is very difficult to design on such a small screen. Brother needs to have a program that will work on a computer to make designing easier. I did gave difficulties getting my phone to connect to the printer after I designed my work on the very small screen. I used the chat feature on the Brother site and they were able to help me get it connected in order to print.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 2, 2024
B
Verified Purchase
Bruce
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
Printer
Set name: Sublimation Printer
Bought is a Christmas gift. Has not been turned off since. Lol
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 29, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Ms.S.Butta
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 1
NOt good... not great... horrible
Set name: Sublimation Printer
I’m thoroughly disappointed with the Brother Sublimation Printer and would not recommend it. Out of the box, the setup process was more complex than anticipated, with unclear instructions and frequent errors. The print quality was inconsistent, with colors often coming out dull or inaccurate, despite multiple attempts at calibration. I experienced frequent paper jams, which disrupted my workflow and wasted a lot of materials. The printer’s software is buggy and doesn’t integrate well with other design programs, making it frustrating to use. The connectivity options were unreliable, causing frequent disconnections and delays. Additionally, the printer is quite noisy during operation, which can be distracting and bothersome. The build quality feels flimsy and not as durable as I expected. The customer support experience was also poor, with slow response times and unhelpful solutions. I faced issues with ink usage, as the cartridges seemed to run out quickly, leading to higher operational costs. The sublimation prints didn’t have the sharp, vibrant quality I was hoping for, making my final products look less professional. The lack of clear troubleshooting guides added to the frustration. The printer’s design is bulky and takes up more space than I anticipated. Overall, this Brother Sublimation Printer has been a letdown in terms of performance, reliability, and ease of use. I regret investing in this product and would advise looking for alternatives.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 9, 2024
R
Verified Purchase
Roy Adorjan
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 4
Pretty good for the price.
Set name: Sublimation Printer
So far so good. I have been producing a fair amount of items to date. My only wish was that the colors were more vibrant with this printer and it's ink.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 27, 2025
T
Verified Purchase
TMull98
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 5
Print quality is excellent!
Model: 500N STD
This is my first sublimation printer and I am so happy with my purchase! The print quality is absolutely amazing! I have made a few items and they came out perfectly! The design software and printing software that come with the printer are good but they are really slow. Before you buy, think carefully about what size prints you want to make. This printer only prints up to 8.5x14. Some t-shirt designs are larger than that. The ink is also very expensive. Versiflex ink is much cheaper. It might be worth researching the versiflex model before you commit to this printer.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 1, 2025

recommand products