Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 10 - Jul 15
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Tension Rod Bush Single (Single) for Nissan 1600 - AR5089Vehicle Fitment & Part Details This tension Rod Bush Single is listed for the Nissan 1600, Nissan 1800, Nissan Pulsarand other listed applications and cross references OE 54476 21000. Confirm compatibility by matching the listed fitment details and any OEM reference numbers supplied. Verify VIN engine. Key Details SKU AR5089 Component Tension Rod Bush Single Configuration Single OEM References 54476 21000 Primary Fitment Nissan 1600 Specs Inner
Vehicle Fitment & Part Details
This tension Rod Bush Single is listed for the Nissan 1600, Nissan 1800, Nissan Pulsarand other listed applications and cross-references OE 54476-21000. Confirm compatibility by matching the listed fitment details and any OEM reference numbers supplied. Verify VIN/engine.
Key Details
- SKU
- AR5089
- Component
- Tension Rod Bush Single
- Configuration
- Single
- OEM References
- 54476-21000
- Primary Fitment
- Nissan 1600
- Specs
- Inner Diameter: 17.5 mm; Outer Diameter: 52 mm; Length: 29 mm
Listing Highlights
- Listed for selected Nissan applications shown in the vehicle fitment table.
- Cross-referenced to listed OE numbers for compatibility checking before ordering.
- Useful for matching by AR5089, OE reference and original part comparison.
Vehicle Fitment
Includes 3 supplied applications covering Nissan 1600, 1800, Pulsar. Use the full table below to confirm model, year range and engine details before ordering.
| Make | Model / Application | Years |
|---|---|---|
| Nissan | 1600, 160U, 160Y, 160Z | 1969-1978 |
| Nissan | 1800, 1800J, 180U | 1969-1980 |
| Nissan | Pulsar 1.3 | 1969-1986 |
Fitment Notes
- Always match OEM reference number(s) and vehicle details before ordering. Verify VIN/engine.
Compatibility Verification Notes
- Confirm compatibility using VIN, engine code, chassis / platform, OE reference and original part comparison before ordering.
- Match the supplied fitment details to your vehicle, including model, year range and any listed engine or chassis information.
- Fitment data may vary by production date, market, import history and engine variant.
- This listing is for part identification and compatibility checking only. Installation must be carried out according to the vehicle manufacturer's service information by a suitably qualified person.
Common Questions
Will this tension Rod Bush Single fit my Nissan 1600?
This part (AR5089) is listed for the fitments shown on this page. Confirm by matching the fitment details. Verify VIN/engine.
What OEM part numbers does this cross-reference?
Cross-reference numbers are listed in the Key Details section above. Match at least one to your original part before ordering.
How do I confirm fitment if there are multiple variants?
Compare the supplied fitment details, OE reference numbers, original part details and any listed variant information before ordering. Verify VIN/engine.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 1843 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Make Sure You Read the Vintage Edition with the Afterword
I initially purchased this book to read for two reasons: First, it was written by William Styron, who wrote the great "Sophie's Choice;" and second, it won a Pulitzer Prize. It was only after I was into the book that I learned that this vintage sixties' book was the subject of a major controversy over the depiction of the title character, Nat Turner.
I learned that Styron openly acknowledged fictionalizing large portions of Turner's life, including his motivations for leading the slave revolt. I also learned that Styron's largely fictionalized portrait of Turner outraged many black leaders of the time. Rather than painting Turner (entirely) as a hero, called to action by the injustices of slavery, Styron created a darker picture of a man fixated on religion, a vision of himself as a prophet, and frustrated by lust and desire (particularly, for a young, blond haired white girl).
As I read the book, I search my own feelings, and felt that if I were black, I would certainly have objected similarly. We all need our heroes, who become much larger as symbols than they could ever be as people. For the sake of those that come after, such icons are perhaps entitled to be treated with a greater level of sensitivity and care--even at the cost of literary restraint.
It is here that the story gets fascinating. After I finished the novel, I read Styron's Afterword. Styron was truly stung by the criticism and in the Afterword, provided an elegant and persuasive defense of his writings. While I will not say that Styron entirely changed my position, he definitely made me see the other side of the argument. The dialogue between Styron and his critics not only allows the reader to consider one of the great social and political issues of our time, but permits the reader a unique insight into the thinking of a great writer--and suffices, in and of itself, as a reason for reading this novel. MAKE SURE YOUR VERSION OF THE NOVEL HAS THIS AFTERWORD.
Putting the issue aside as to the real "Nat Turner," the novel itself is beautifully written. The characters are fully developed and believable. The description of the system of slavery and the relationship between whites and blacks feel very real, and very accurate. Styron shows us good and bad of each race, and how all of them are bound by the system of slavery and their actions directly the product of it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 26, 2008
★★★★★ 5
I loved this book.
I read this book for my book club and I thought it was beautifully written. It has stayed with me for weeks now. I love when a book does that. I'm glad I wasn't swayed by controversy. I had no problem with the fact that the author was white and using a black voice(maybe because I'm white - but I do like when an author gets the voice right and I thought Styron did that). I didn't understand the charges of racism after reading the book. Sometimes I wonder if, what some people find uncomfortable, they label as racist or sexist or whatever. Anyway, I would encourage everyone to read this book because it gave me a fresh awareness of a huge part of U.S. history, it reminded me that there are always gray areas to consider and it was a great novel. You might think so too.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 8, 2007
★★★★★ 5
great read
I enjoyed this book. As a person who enjoys history this book was a great read for me and the author gives an in depth vision on the trial.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 14, 2023
★★★★★ 3
Nat Turner was NOT happy
I think Mr Styron may have took some liberties with Nat Turner's "orientation" without the research or data to support his opinion.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 20, 2016
★★★★★ 5
A book for the ages...historically concise and horrific at once
William Styron, a gifted writer outdid himself with this book. His concise detail gives us an inside view on the depth of feeling employed by the subject of this book. The book while concise and tender pulls us in as these events take place. As Mailer delves deeper into the mind of Nat Turner, we cannot help but feel a sense of the suffering this man endured and this is what gives us perspective into this tragedy as it unfolds. A compelling masterpiece of literature.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 20, 2012